Skip to content

HotMetaL

When I first came to Canada I worked at SoftQuad. SoftQuad was one of the first SGML com­pan­ies, well known (in some circles, any­way) for its Pres­id­ent, Yuri Rub­in­sky. And well known in many other circles for its HTML editor, HoT­MetaL. The Sur­rey office did most of the devel­op­ment work on HoT­MetaL and it was my main focus for quite some time. So it was with a cer­tain amount of nos­tal­gia that I saw HoT­MetaL lis­ted on eWeek’s Jim Rapoza Picks the Top Web Tech­no­lo­gies of All Time — gone but not for­got­ten, as they say. Thanks to Kim for send­ing me the link.

{ 6 } Comments

  1. David Orchard | Mar 30, 2007 at 8:34 am | Permalink

    Noth­ing like nos­tal­gia. Did you keep any cop­ies of the soft­ware (and maybe com­puter to run it) for old-time’s sake?

  2. Lauren Wood | Mar 30, 2007 at 8:43 am | Permalink

    Oh yes, I’ve got cop­ies of most of the ver­sions I worked on. I also have the small bottle of Cana­dian Cham­pagne we all were given when HoT­MetaL PRO 2.0 won PC Magazine Edit­ors’ Choice award in 1995 — I figured it prob­ably wasn’t worth drink­ing, but it was worth keeping.

  3. Chris | Aug 25, 2007 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    I still use HoT­MetaL 6 for my sites. Damn good pro­gram (albeit a few bugs). Tried dream­weaver and a couple other edit­ors but after get­ting good with Hot­MetaL, everything else just sucks. I’ve seen a few other users with sim­ilar com­ments in for­ums here and there.

    Just wish someone had picked it up and con­tin­ued devel­op­ment, or that they had released it to a gnu devel­op­ment com­munity or some­thing. Seems such a waste for it to just fall off a cliff. The tags on view and rules check­ing just haven’t been duplic­ated any­where else that I have found.

  4. meduse | Aug 30, 2007 at 7:13 am | Permalink

    Dear Lauren,

    first, let me con­grat­u­late you to the best WYSIWYG web editor I’ve seen until today. Most of all I love is the tag view. We still use this soft­ware for mul­tiple of our websites.

    It’s a pity, that HoT­MetaL will not be developed fur­ther. I agree with Chis’ wish that it became a gnu development.

    I’ve tried to teach HoT­MetaL cur­rent W3C DTDs like xhtml strict/transitional, but without suc­cess (it uses — as XMetaL — bin­ary DTD-equivs (rls) I think).

    Nev­er­the­less — a superb “hot” software!

  5. Daniel | Mar 31, 2008 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    Dear Lauren,
    I never found a Wysi­wyg editor that is so con­veni­ent and at the same time pro­duces so clean html. What a pity that it is not developed fur­ther. A GNU devel­op­ment would be great! Can­not the NVU or Kom­pozer people use it?
    What is the latest ver­sion of HoT­Metal?
    http://www.powerstream.com/hotmetal-pro-patches.htm
    provides the updates to ver­sion 6.0.3.164. Appar­ently it does under­stand HTML 4.01.
    Is there any way to teach HoT­MetaL XHTML?
    Shall we form a mailinglist?

  6. Lauren Wood | Apr 01, 2008 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    Hi Daniel,

    as we dis­cussed in email, ver­sion 6.0 is the latest and final ver­sion, and I don’t even know pre­cisely who owns the rights to it. Maybe Corel still does?

    There is unfor­tu­nately no way to teach HoT­MetaL how to under­stand XHTML as there are too many things that would need to be changed. For example, HoT­MetaL auto­mat­ic­ally upper­cases all the tag names, and it doesn’t under­stand the com­mon empty tag syn­tax. The pro­gram itself would have to be changed to do this. It would be pos­sible, but I guess the people who cur­rently own the rights don’t think it’s worth doing.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *