It seems that August is conference season, at least for me. More precisely, one week in August. First Balisage in Montréal (for which the online registration is closing next Friday) August 12–15, and then Vinocamp here in Vancouver, at the UBC Botanical Garden, on August 16th. I’m speaking at the former, and helping organise the latter (for which numbers are limited to 120, so don’t wait too long to register). The premise for Vinocamp is a friendly conference about wine, put on by a bunch of techies; this is its first year. Both conferences should be fun! Entertaining as well as educational, and a certain amount of good food and wine in both locations. I can certainly think of worse ways to spend a week in August.
It’s not often that I have a blog title that’s only acronyms (in fact, I think this is a first), and it’s also a first in that I’m posting looking for someone to join the team and project I’m on. I can’t write much about the project itself here, since we’re still in stealth mode, but I can write quite a bit about who we’re looking for. Experts in the above acronyms is the short version (the meanings in this context being user experience, user research, and user interface design); for the longer version you’ll need to jump past the break.
The project I’m working on (actually, I’m program manager for it), is a lot of fun. It’s a research project, so the work we’re doing may or may not end up in one or more of Sun’s products at some stage. We will be releasing the code to open source, however, so your work will eventually be out in the public view no matter what. One of the focus points for this project is usability, coupled with radically innovative design. To combine radical design with usability requires user research, which means talking to real people, conducting focus groups, asking people what they want, watching them as they use the prototypes. In other words, it requires testing your design ideas to ensure that being radical hasn’t detracted from being usable. You’d be expected to take the lead on writing the screeners and running the focus groups, evaluating the responses, and changing the UI designs to make them even more usable.
We’re looking for designers, not developers, although if you can design and code that would be welcome. The location is flexible as long as you can keep the same core working hours as most of the team, roughly 9 am to 2 pm Pacific time. You need to be able to work efficiently with other team members using phone, email, and IM, as we’re spread across four countries and 9 timezones and typically only meet face to face as a team once a year for a couple of days.
For more information, send me an email. This is a fun project, the most fun in a project that I’ve had for some years now, and all we need right now is to find the right UI/UE/UR expert to add to the team.
The idea of wikis, the whole concept of collaborative authoring, is so enticing that it seems like it should be the default (at least if you don’t need more structured markup behind it), even in the enterprise. At least, that’s what I thought some years ago. People still like to send around office documents with revision marking turned on, however, rather than fully embrace the Brave New World.
I tweeted that one problem is likely the offline issues (can’t read the document on the airplane unless I’ve saved a copy first); Edd added the “lost document” problem where you can easily lose a document when someone deletes the link to it, and you never find it again. Spam, as Norm pointed out, is another issue on the internet, though it shouldn’t be on the intranet.
And then there’s the issue of wiki markup, which some people detest. One project I’m working on for Sun is using MediaWiki, for which you can export a document from OpenOffice, so that helps with at least getting the first draft of the document into the system. There’s still the update problem; I gather that is slated for a future release of the wiki publisher extension. When that works, I hope it will make it easier to talk certain members of my team at Sun into using the system willingly <grin>.
Every now and then I think I should meditate for a few minutes a day. Somehow I seldom do, although I find listening to a meditation track when flying is a good way to tune out the standard airplane unpleasantness. Having read When Distraction is Good, it seems to me as if meditation and “receptive distraction” are probably related. Maybe you can think of going for a quiet walk, or sitting in the garden breathing in the fresh air, as some sort of meditation. As long as you don’t then start thinking about the weeding, of course.
Maybe I’ll find that easier to fit into my day.
Up till now I’ve been running the home firewall and a couple of minor websites from an old (1996 or thereabouts) Pentium 3 box in the basement, that uses Debian. It seems to work reasonably well, and has been fending off bots and other threats with adequate ferocity. There seems no reason, however, to think that the number of attacks will decrease in the next little while, and every reason to suspect that one of these days the hard disk will fail, leaving me without a firewall. The websites are backed up and easily restorable, the time to set up a firewall and get it working with a PPPoE connection to an ISP that doesn’t understand Linux is what will take the time.
So I’ve been wondering about rejigging the whole network, getting an off-the-shelf hardware firewall/router that can feed into the wireless router. I’m a little paranoid about getting something that is secure but not intending to spend thousands. We’ve blocked all ports except the necessary ones on the system right now, except for allowing SSH access in and out, and, of course, port 80 for the web sites. Security will be particularly important as the kids move into the teenage years and start wanting to download stuff.
I’m looking for some advice here. Do I need anything more than NAT, DMZ, and forwarding appropriate ports to internal servers, which I can get from standard consumer-level router/firewalls? Any particularly good brands and models I should look for?