Snarky Crafts

When you’ve almost come to the end of the cur­rent list of craft pro­jects (some­thing that will prob­ably apply to me in about, oh, the year 2012 or so if I’m lucky), and you’re look­ing around for ideas, here are a couple of web sites you might enjoy. Actu­ally, look at them before you get to the end of that list, as you’re unlikely to want to make any­thing fea­tured here. Warn­ing: be care­ful with your cof­fee when you start look­ing at these.

Item 1 is even called What Not to Crochet (link thanks to Tim) and fea­tures all sorts of items that make you won­der who would put any time at all into buy­ing the yarn for them, let alone actu­ally mak­ing them. There are even design­ers out there using crochet as a base for mod­ern art (about which I am obvi­ously a phil­istine and have no appre­ci­ation of the finer points) — check out the bunny suit as an example of that, and then the com­plete web­site from the designer. 

Item 2 (not sure how I stumbled across this): Thread­bared has some delight­fully snarky com­ments on old sew­ing, knit­ting, and crochet pat­terns. Some of the items them­selves are actu­ally ok (unlike almost all from the What Not to Crochet link), but the set shots haven’t worn well (and most of them were prob­ably ridicu­lous even when brand new). 

Kate Atkinson’s “Emotionally Weird”

Kate Atkin­son’s “Emo­tion­ally Weird” (Amazon link link, Pow­ells link) is anoth­er book­club selec­tion, and is per­haps not the easi­est book to write about. As befits the title, the entire book is weird both in plot and in con­struc­tion, and at times feels a little over-clev­er, as if parts were intro­duced as some sort of game the author plays with the read­ers. To me the book was worth read­ing, but if you look at the reviews on Amazon, you’ll see a lot of people dis­agree (everything from 1 to 5 stars).

Effie, the cent­ral char­ac­ter (I’m not sure wheth­er she really ful­fills the require­ments of the word “heroine”, since she mostly is cata­pul­ted into situ­ations rather than tak­ing charge of any­thing) is a stu­dent at the Uni­ver­sity of Dun­dee in the early 1970s. Effie’s fam­ily cir­cum­stances are mys­ter­i­ous, she has no idea who her fath­er is, she and her moth­er Nora spent her child­hood mov­ing from small town to small town, and she finds the solu­tion to the mys­tery once she and her moth­er spend some time togeth­er on a remote Scot­tish island. 

The book is con­struc­ted as inter­leaved pas­sages of talks between Effie and Nora, and the nar­ra­tion of Effie’s life at the uni­ver­sity. The pleth­ora of char­ac­ters is dis­tract­ing; it’s hard to tell who will be import­ant to the plot, and who is simply func­tion­ing as the clas­sic­al mys­tery red her­ring (the yel­low dog men­tioned on the dust­jack­et being one good example). Nora sums it up when she says there are too many minor char­ac­ters and also com­plains about the lack of plot (Effie: “not neces­sary in this post-mod­ern day and age”). But of course there is a plot, a plot about who Effie’s moth­er is (open­ing line: “My moth­er is a vir­gin.” and later on “my moth­er is not my moth­er”), who her fath­er is, how all these threads may or may not interconnect.

The descrip­tions of uni­ver­sity life and stu­dents in the 1970s, when it was much easi­er to get into uni­ver­sity and many people felt no oblig­a­tion to actu­ally do any work once there, are bit­ing and have the ring of truth. The pom­pos­ity and self-right­eous­ness that seems to inhab­it many uni­ver­sit­ies, the tend­ency of ivory towers to find things import­ant that make no sense to out­siders, are described and lam­pooned. The con­ver­sa­tion­al style also helps with this as it allows lots of room for “exag­ger­a­tion for effect”. In fact much of the time I found myself won­der­ing how much was truth, how much exag­ger­a­tion for effect, and how much out­right lies in Effie’s nar­rat­ive. Most of the appar­ent con­tra­dic­tions were resolved by the end of the book, the oth­ers were not of major import­ance to the plot. As an example, I nev­er did quite fig­ure out the plot­line with the yel­low dogs, but that was prob­ably because I did­n’t put much effort into it.

The book­club mem­bers enjoyed the book, not great lit­er­at­ure, but a fun read with some sat­is­fy­ingly weird twists and turns. One of our bet­ter picks, I think.

Crochet Danger

I had to laugh at Eve’s link to the story of the weenie who was scared of knit­ting needles (while admit­ting I first saw the link at whump dot com from fol­low­ing XML 2005 Aggreg­at­or links). I have a bet­ter story than mere knit­ting needles or even nee­dle­work needles, since all of those have really blunt ends.

When the TSA dir­ect­ives first came out after Septem­ber 11, ban­ning knit­ting needles, I, along with a lot of oth­er people, was struck by the arbit­rar­i­ness of the bans. No knives, but forks were still allowed, and so were glasses made of glass. Per­son­ally I’d rather have someone come at me with a blunt knife that’s not cap­able of cut­ting any­thing than a broken glass. So I read the list of banned items and noticed that crochet hooks wer­en’t on the list. Giv­en that in terms of crafts I bounce between knit­ting, nee­dle­work, crochet, and lots of oth­ers, I have a good sup­ply of crochet hooks. I picked one out to take on my next set of flights. Not just any crochet hook though, one of my fine 1.25 mm crochet hooks that at the time I was using for filet crochet. So this is a hook, with what can only be described as a barb on one end, with a total dia­met­er of 1.25 mm (I have smal­ler, but had two of the 1.25 mm hooks so could eas­ily risk los­ing one).

The first secur­ity per­son checked the hook, looked wor­ried, asked her super­visor, the super­visor said “crochet hooks are allowed”. And that was it. On board I went, with my filet crochet and my crochet hook. These days knit­ting needles are expressly allowed, as are crochet hooks (although the TSA calls them “crochet needles”) so I will still be able to carry around my filet crochet hooks and scare unsus­pect­ing knit­ting needle phobics (yes, there is such a thing as a needle pho­bia; most people who suf­fer from it have pho­bi­as about vac­cin­a­tion and blood test-type needles, not knit­ting needles, although the pho­bia is appar­ently bad enough in some people to be set off by any needle-type object). 

So if you see someone with what looks like a viciously thin, barbed object and thin yarn, just remem­ber the TSA per­mits it. Mind you, read­ing that list does raise oth­er ques­tions, such as “if you can­’t smoke on board, why do you need a cigar cut­ter?” and “why are toy trans­former robots expressly per­mit­ted but not oth­er toys?” but that’s just me being picky.

Okanagan Wineries

We went up to the Okanagan wine dis­trict for the Canada Day week­end this year, and I think it’s about time I wrote down some of my impres­sions of the vine­yards and the wine. We took my friend Sally (she of G&T fame who knows a lot about wine), and had a great time. Tim mostly enter­tained the off­spring while Sally and I tasted the wine, which seemed like a good divi­sion of labour to all of us. I typ­ic­ally like wines with body and heft, such as shiraz, much of the caber­net fam­ily, and rieslings; my impres­sions of oth­er wines depend on what they evoke (sit­ting on the deck in sum­mer, or some food pair­ing). So here are some notes about the winer­ies and the wines, none of them are any­thing sci­entif­ic or indeed any­thing oth­er than my impres­sion of that day!

Hawthorne Moun­tain Vineyards
Great view, but a very com­mer­cial vine­yard with lots of schnick-schnack to buy. I’d bought some caber­net franc here in 1995–6 which was great after a few years cel­lar­ing, but the 2003 Caber­net Franc they had on offer this year was too light and did­n’t give me any con­fid­ence it would devel­op the way I like. The pinot gris was good so I got some of that. The gewürztram­iner was ok though we’d had bet­ter at oth­er winer­ies, so that did­n’t go home with us, and although I thought the See-ya-later pinot noir could devel­op, I did­n’t feel like tak­ing the risk.
Wild Goose Vine­yards & Winery
Very friendly people, good whites (some have won prizes) though not what I’d call earth-shat­ter­ingly great. I bought a mixed case of whites, includ­ing the 2004 Riesling, 2003 Stony Slope Riesling, and the 2004 Gewürztraminer.
Stag’s Hol­low Winery
Unfriendly serv­er but a good vid­al (2004 Tra­gic­ally Vid­al), which is an unusu­al grape, and the 2002 Renais­sance Mer­lot struck me as worth tak­ing home, so I bought a couple of bottles for the cel­lar. It should be really good in a couple of years.
Hainle Vine­yards Estate Winery
Nice people, organ­ic wines; they’ve learned a lot about mak­ing organ­ic wines pal­at­able since I last vis­ited in 1996 or so. Good bis­tro for lunch out­side on the deck as well. The 2002 Hainle Chardon­nay, 2002 Hainle Pinot Blanc, 2002 Deep Creek Pinot Meuni­er (nice rich taste, like the Hawthorne Moun­tain one from 1995 or so), and 2003 Deep Creek Z2 were all good, the 2003 Hainle Syrah ok. Bought a mixed bunch to cel­lar, mostly the Pinot Meuni­er and Chardon­nay as they’re in short sup­ply and I figured I prob­ably could­n’t find them in Vancouver. 
Arrowleaf
New winery and quite far north. Friendly people. Bought a couple of bottles of 2002 Zei­gelt for the cel­lar, and some 2004 Bac­chus (nice light grape) and 2004 Gewürztram­iner for drinking. 
St Hubertus Estate Winery
Much of the winery was des­troyed in the big fire of 2003, but they’ve rebuilt with a big­ger tast­ing room. The rub­ber stamps are now in the tast­ing room rather than in a sep­ar­ate build­ing; they add a touch of eclecticism to the place. Decent selec­tion of wines. We picked the 2004 Dry Riesling to take home (with Tim warn­ing by this stage that we did­n’t have much room left in the car!)
Raven Ridge Cidery
Not quite a winery, this one, but a cidery con­nec­ted to an orch­ard with a good res­taur­ant. I picked up their last two bottles of Spark­ling Cider as well as a bottle of Brae­burn iced cider (like ice wine, but tastes of apples), just for a change. 

Tour­ing Okanagan winer­ies is an excel­lent exper­i­ence, and hav­ing the kid around meant we also tried out some of the oth­er tour­ist things rather than just sit­ting in the car. So although we did­n’t see as many winer­ies as the 1996 trip, we still filled the car and have wine enough to last us for quite a while!

The Perfect G&T

My friend Sally has the recipe for the per­fect gin and tonic.

My friend Sally vis­ited us from Mel­bourne for about 10 days. I’ve known Sally for half my life; we met when I was study­ing at Mel­bourne Uni­ver­sity. Sally received the Gin Award from Rolland House, the hostel where we lived, so she’s been study­ing the sub­ject for some years and has par­layed her know­ledge into a career organ­iz­ing ban­quets and func­tions for the Athen­aeum Club, a private gen­tle­men’s club (think P.G. Wode­house and Jeeves). I talked Sally into writ­ing down how to make the per­fect G&T for pos­ter­ity, and here it is.

At the end of a long hot day on the road every doc­tor should pre­scribe a G&T to restore one’s pos­it­ive out­look on life. The pre­par­a­tion of the per­fect G&T does how­ever take some effort and even more research. Like many things in life it is all a mat­ter of taste but to help in the research phase I will share some of my own per­son­al find­ings gained over some 23 years.

Select a high­ball glass made from a glass that is on the finer side as I think it improves the taste. It is pos­sible to mix a G&T in an old fash­ioned glass but this requires refills more often.

Add ice, which is import­ant to main­tain the tem­per­at­ure, to the bot­tom of the glass (prob­ably more import­ant on the 3rd or 4th glass as these tend to last longer).

Add the Gin. This is the ele­ment that requires extens­ive research. My per­son­al favour­ite is Bom­bay Sap­phire which has an herb­aceous and com­plex fla­vour but I would encour­age you to sample as many types as pos­sible. Just like a good scotch or wine there are many fla­vour com­bin­a­tions. Gor­dons is really light and crisp, it isn’t very com­plex or herb­aceous. Tan­queray is quite lem­ony and a bit sharp­er and more bitter.

The amount required tra­di­tion­ally is 30ml but I have found that it some­times depends on how much pos­it­ive out­look you require. Once again this also takes some research to get it right and will depend on the gin of choice.

The ton­ic is often much under-estim­ated and is worthy of the time and effort of get­ting a bet­ter qual­ity and hav­ing a few bottles in the fridge for those emer­gency situ­ations. I usu­ally sug­gest the small 300ml splits as they are one use and avoid the dis­ap­point­ment of a half-used flat bottle. I prefer Schweppes. Do your­self a favour and don’t get the diet style, after all this is for medi­cin­al pur­poses. Dur­ing my time in Canada I have found the Canada Dry style of ton­ic water is a very good substitute. 

The per­fect G&T should have a half slice of lem­on or lime to fin­ish it off, I prefer lime with my Bom­bay gin but if I can­’t get it then lem­on. I use lem­on with Tan­queray or Gordons. 

Take the per­fect G&T out onto the porch and con­sume till your pos­it­ive out­look on life has been restored.

This has been a life-long pro­ject and I have spent many hours of research to get to this point. I hope this has inspired you to start your own research project.