Owning Homes

In the midst of the U.S. hous­ing crisis, Paul Ked­rosky asks, quite reas­on­ably, Why Do We Want People to Own Homes? I’ve been won­der­ing that myself. Is it because people think houses are a good invest­ment? Because they have sen­ti­ment­al attach­ments to the idea of own­ing the roof over their head? Because they want to be sure no-one can toss them out of their home? Because every­one else does?

I remem­ber years ago in Aus­tralia (where almost every­one also wants to own their own home) talk­ing to a Ger­man immig­rant who com­plained bit­terly that he could­n’t rent any­where nice to live and so he had to buy a house. He would have been much hap­pi­er rent­ing, as people com­monly do in Ger­many. Maybe the rent­al prop­er­ties are bet­ter in Ger­many because so many people rent, or maybe part of it is because in Ger­many it’s com­mon to make modi­fic­a­tions to an apart­ment you rent, for example by renov­at­ing the kit­chen (you own the appli­ances, the cab­in­ets, etc, and take them with you if you move). People often rent the same apart­ment for 20 years or more, which is longer than many people in North Amer­ica stay in houses they buy, so it’s worth their time and effort to make it a nice place to live.

Dif­fer­ent coun­tries, dif­fer­ent ideas. For us ten years ago, there were a couple of reas­ons to buy rather than rent. We saw it as a reas­on­able invest­ment, we wanted to live in a house with a garden, and I wanted a couple of cats. So buy­ing made sense (many land­lords don’t like pets).

As house prices climb to the extent that it’s ques­tion­able how good an invest­ment they are (how high can they keep going?), it’ll be inter­est­ing to see what hap­pens. Here in Van­couver house prices have been rising to the extent that many land­lords are selling the rent­al houses to people who ren­ov­ate and move in them­selves, rather than rent­ing them out. For fam­il­ies with chil­dren in loc­al schools, hav­ing the land­lord sell the house out from under them is extremely dis­rupt­ive, espe­cially when they can afford to rent, but can­’t afford to buy, in the area they’re liv­ing in. From the land­lord’s per­spect­ive, they’re cash­ing in on the cap­it­al gains rather than tak­ing a rent that just can­’t com­pare as a return on their invest­ment. Either the house prices will have to come down, or the rents will have to go up, unless people are will­ing to con­tin­ue to gamble on mak­ing their money from cap­it­al gains.

And in the U.S., own­ing the house does­n’t mean someone can­’t turf you out if you default on a pay­ment or two. The Eco­nom­ist has an art­icle in this week’s magazine about the U.S. hous­ing crisis, point­ing out that fore­clos­ure pro­ceed­ings can take months in some states, but less than a month in Texas. Which makes me won­der even more why people buy­ing houses they could­n’t afford did­n’t rent instead.

Musings on Copyright

I know why it happened, but it still strikes me as odd, the fact that the goal­posts kept mov­ing, as it were, with copy­right. And it’s weird no mat­ter wheth­er the copy­right is there to give oth­er people rights to use, copy and modi­fy the work, or rights to the author to pro­tect and profit from their work. In oth­er areas of the law, the gen­er­al rule is that what counts is the law at the time. It’s only illeg­al if it was illeg­al at the time the offence was com­mit­ted, for example (the major excep­tion being crimes against human­ity). Even pat­ents are val­id for a set peri­od of time, and com­pan­ies know how long that will be when they apply for the pat­ent (hence all the phar­ma­ceut­ic­al tricks with minor modi­fic­a­tions that they hope will be just enough to get a new pat­ent on). Only in copy­right, that I’m aware of, has it been the case that the peri­od of valid­ity has been so massively changed and applied ret­ro­act­ively. From 21 years (see His­tory of Copy­right to the death of the author plus 50–75 years, depend­ing on the coun­try you live in and some con­vo­luted depend­en­cies. And then there’s the fam­ous exten­sion by which Mickey Mouse would have been in the pub­lic domain by now, but won’t be for a while yet. 

It just seems odd to me, the fact that copy­right is the excep­tion to the gen­er­al rule. But maybe it just seems odd to me.

Personality Types

I’ve worked at com­pan­ies that did Myers-Brigg­s/Keir­sey tem­pera­ment test­ing on people, and just for fun decided to try out anoth­er couple of tests over the last couple of months, most recently at mypersonality.info. It seems my per­son­al­ity type wanders, from INTJ to INTP and over to ISTJ. Either that, or I look at myself dif­fer­ently on dif­fer­ent days, or respond unex­pec­tedly to nuances in ques­tions. At least two of the four axes are reas­on­ably stable, even if the oth­er two aren’t. For­tu­nately nobody I know takes this stuff too ser­i­ously; as the sites say, these are all tend­en­cies rather than absolutes.

Anoth­er inter­est­ing point: all three of those per­son­al­ity types are said to be more pre­val­ent in males than females. And prob­ably more pre­val­ent in the career path I’ve chosen as well.

UPS Rip-Offs

I’ve writ­ten in this blog before about UPS and their broker­age fees. I just today had anoth­er example. I ordered some­thing from the U.S. (knit­ting gad­gets I haven’t found in stores in Canada) and the order was $US50. Works out to about $53 Cana­dian at cur­rent rates. The broker­age fee that UPS charged me to bring it into Canada was $29.55 plus GST. That plus the nor­mal GST of $6.85 (to which I have no objec­tion) brought the total charge to $38.18. On goods worth $52.73. When I called up UPS to ask what was going on, I was told that’s the fee. Noth­ing I can do about it. Except, of course, for mak­ing sure that I nev­er ship via UPS. Oh yes, I did email the seller of the goods to warn her of the prob­lem and ask her to not ship via UPS for her Cana­dian cus­tom­ers. And my loc­al ship­ping store, which used to be an MBE and is now a “UPS Store”, will suf­fer as well, since they have to use UPS to ship any­thing out­side of Canada (with­in Canada they still have some choice). Not that I ship a lot, but when I do, it won’t be UPS if I can pos­sibly avoid it.

If you want the gory details, they’re here. $19.45 fee, plus $4.25 COD fee, plus a $5.85 bond fee because I did­n’t pre­pay the broker­age fee. Adds up to $29.55.

City Mayhem

Today was my turn to take the boy to his soc­cer camp; it also turned out to be the day after the police shot someone on a main street. The afore­said street was com­pletely closed down for a block which caused a cer­tain amount of traffic hav­oc. I got a close-up look at the deser­ted street while inch­ing past the yel­low “Police — do not cross” tape (it’s on the usu­al route to the camp). When I got to the camp, I found more chaos in the park­ing lot, since two-thirds of the lot was blocked off for shoot­ing some film (a com­mon occur­rence in Van­couver). I finally made it back home again, only to find the cat in the back yard play­ing with an almost-dead rat. With the cur­rent strike in Van­couver includ­ing the garbage pick-up ser­vices, the rat pop­u­la­tion has exploded, so I don’t actu­ally object to the cats catch­ing rats, but I don’t really want to have to watch. 

Sum­mer in the city, I guess.