Jun 262012
 

This year’s Northern Voice was held downtown, and was smaller than the last couple of years. I like the small conference personally, it’s easier to chat with lots of different people, the lines at registration aren’t as long, and the conference as a whole feels more personal. This is the strength of Northern Voice for me, it’s a pleasant contrast to large conferences where keynotes are sold to the sponsors and there are advertising banners everywhere. Yes, Northern Voice has sponsors who show up and have a presence and maybe even a table, but they are all respectful of the spirit of the conference. For which I, at least, am grateful.

I spent the first bit of the conference helping out on the registration table. A certain amount of hectic, but not too bad. I then moderated Martha Rans’ talk on Copyright for Canadians did a good job, I thought, of giving information without overwhelming everyone. The Artists Legal Outreach site has more in-depth information, in what they call toolkits.

Lunch at the W2 cafe was great and the big wooden circles in the middle of the atrium space were full of people chatting while balancing plates and glasses. After lunch I sat in on MooseCamp for a while, knitting and listening and relaxing. And singing with Nancy and the ukuleles. I really must get back to singing, it’s been a long time since I sang regularly.

Another important talk was Daniel Cowen’s talk on privacy. A lot of the subject matter was familiar to me from my work at Sun, where I was part of a privacy and identity group, but Daniel took it a step further by seeing how much someone without specialised tools or knowledge could find out about someone online. In four hours they had a worrying amount of information about a woman they code-named “Tara”, enough to run any number of social engineering attacks or compromise any “secret question” systems. People in the session were genuinely shocked at just how much information is available online, and how many details, innocuous in themselves, can be added together.

Friday ended with the wine tasting and party in the atrium.

Saturday dawned bright and early with Blaine Cook’s wonderful keynote, celebrating diversity in culture, life, and technology platforms in the face of globalisation and market forces. He tied together architecture, rainforest, and people fighting to save their culture with the domination by large platforms such as Facebook and Twitter to encourage diversity and independence.

Shane Birley’s keynote was of a different style but had some of the same underlying themes, celebrating individual voice, charting his personal journey online, and encouraging all of us to try out new ways of communicating and sharing who we are. All delivered in inimitable Shane style, of course!

All in all, it was a lot of work and I was exhausted by the end of the two days, but it was all worthwhile. The energy and enthusiasm was obvious with all the discussions and interactions and it’s also been great to see all the tweets and blog posts continue.

May 182011
 

That was what we put on the front of the t-shirts this year, #nv11. Some bright spark (I forget who, sorry, the two days blur together a bit) pointed out that the t-shirts were green with NV, which was an impressive pun, or at least better than anything I could come up with on my own.

As always, the days were full, and this year I made it to the party at the Academic as well, which gave me a chance to chat to different people. I’m still trying to figure out whether I liked the Moose cocktail the Academic designed for us or not. The food was good, and the candy bar went down well with everyone.

I managed to miss the morning keynote (the school run took priority), so for me the sessions part of the conference started with the first panel I moderated: Courting Controversy: Dancing with the Devil. Rebecca Coleman, Kazia Mullin, and Lorraine Murphy had everything so well organised that I didn’t need to do anything, I just sat there and watched and listened, prepared to help if they needed it (which they didn’t). They have all summarised their takes on the panel; there are lots of useful hints in there as to how to deal with controversy (and anyone who allows any sorts of comments will). I’m glad I got to listen to this one.

I sat in on the Social Media and Online Defamation: Keeping Out of Court panel for a bit, some interesting information there about the upcoming Supreme Court decision on whether linking to something libellous means that you are considered to have libelled someone yourself, which is a frightening concept and will definitely have a chilling effect on spreading news if it goes the wrong way. Rob Cottingham has a summary in cartoon form. It was interesting comparing this panel with the courting controversy one; “play it safe” vs “be brave”.

I didn’t make it to any sessions after that on the Friday, dealing with various issues or chatting with people in the atrium, but I did make it to the Township 7 winetasting, albeit at the end. And then, of course, the party.

The party was followed by the morning after, being in time to welcome people to the second day and introduce Chris Wilson for his keynote From Dial-up Modems to Post-“Social Media”: A Journey. I enjoyed it, especially when he reminded us all just how fast technology has changed and how much of what is available today would have seemed unbelievable 10 or 15 years ago.

After lunch I moderated Tim’s Sex, Lies, and Wikipedia talk, which, of course, didn’t need much moderation. Tim hasn’t written up his talk, but a search on “Tim Bray wikipedia #nv11” will bring up lots of summaries written by others.

Anthony Marco’s Podcasting with Soul: Try A Little Tenderness was a mix of music and advice on podcasting. He used the music to show how the same basic message (or melody) can sound very different, depending on how it’s presented, and talked about how to get that joy and inspiration into podcasting. I found it interesting, even though I don’t listen to podcasts, with inspiration for written blogging as well.

The last panel was Altruism vs Narcissism: what’s in it for the online reviewer? with Monica Miller, Kyrsten Jensen, Nicole Christen, and Marina Antunes. I ended up asking quite a few questions of the panel to get more details on interesting items. The advice can be best summed up as: keep your integrity. Don’t say you like it if you don’t, but also don’t be too harsh on small independents. In some cases, just don’t post a public review, but in most cases, say what you really think (while stressing it’s your opinion and experience, not Universal Truth). The session was lower energy than lots, since it was getting a little late in the day, and Kyrsten had almost lost her voice, but I think people found it interesting.

And that was it! Northern Voice over for another year.

Apr 182011
 

Every year, when we start organising Northern Voice, the question comes up about keynotes. Keynotes set the tone of a conference, they indicate something of what the organising committee is thinking, or what they think the community that supports the conference might want to hear about. This year, I wanted to find someone as a keynote speaker who could talk to us about the less sunny side of life, and remind us that some of the personal stories people share online aren’t about good things happening, they’re about life happening, and life isn’t always fair, or easy. The rest of the organising committee agreed, and we’re glad that April Smith agreed to present. “Storytelling From the Heart of the City” opens Northern Voice on Friday May 13th.

The Saturday keynote is a different slant on the web, from Chris Wilson, who’s played a key role in building many of the web technologies we use every day. I’m not actually sure what he’s going to talk about, but I have no doubt it will be an interesting view of the web world so many of us now inhabit, sprinkled with interesting anecdotes. I’m looking forward to it!

Two keynotes, two different slants on what the web enables, two different journeys. I’m not very good at chronicling my own journey, but I admire those who do, and I hope (and expect) that the Northern Voice keynotes will give strength and inspiration to all of us.

nv-left.png

Feb 222009
 

I’m slowly recovering from the whirlwind that was Northern Voice this year (I’m one of the organisers). All our hard work paid off, we had the usual last-minute glitches but everyone seemed to enjoy themselves, to make new friends and contacts, to learn new things, to discuss issues they care about, and to have fun.

On Friday I spent most of my time on the registration desk, apart from introducing the conference and listening to Stewart Butterfield’s keynote. Saturday was a little different; I made it to lots of sessions (both keynotes, Aidrie’s panel, my own panel, bits and pieces of other talks/panels). What I took away from all was a sense of community, a sense that the people attending are truly interested in sharing their knowledge and experiences, in being genuine. Even though some blog from a purely personal standpoint, and others from a professional, there was discussion about how to be genuine, how to show who you are within whatever limits you find reasonable (some people blog about their children, others don’t, for example). I’m looking forward to watching the videos of the sessions I didn’t manage to make it to; we only had three sessions concurrently but lots of good topics. The energy in the whole space was amazing.

Saturday night after we got home, we found Vancouver was in the top ten for two trending Twitter topics: Northern Voice and the Canucks. As someone tweeted (sorry, can’t find it now), that really shows that Vancouver people understand how to use these tools for communication. I feel proud, as one of the organisers of Northern Voice, to do my little bit to help, by giving people who care about these things an opportunity to get together and discuss them. And it’s fun – at a Serious Conference we could never get away with putting out a basket of yarn and telling people to make their own lanyards (yes, we had some of those white elastic things for those uncomfortable with the notion). Lots of people gravitated to the bright fluffy stuff, or used multiple strands, creating their own bit of wearable art. And then there was the Moose collection — Rahel Baillie donated her collection of moose as a fund-raiser for the conference, so we had these moose statues and ties and kitsch spread over one corner of the registration desk. Again, not something you can do at a Serious Conference. Which doesn’t mean to say we didn’t talk about serious topics, there were lots of those, and lots of discussion about them.

I’m already looking forward to next year’s Northern Voice.

Mar 132008
 

I just got back from the NorthernVoice organizing committee’s post-conference lunch. The conference motto is personal blogging and social media but lots of people who attend or speak are interested in the professional or corporate aspect as well. As a result, one of the perennial topics we talk about is who the conference is for, and what do participants want to listen to. I touched on some of this in my Ebbs and Blogs posting. Personally I’m more interested in the personal blogging aspects than the company PR aspects (YMMV, of course).

Which raises some interesting questions – why would personal bloggers come to a conference? I can think of a few reasons:

  • to learn more about techniques, e.g., how to podcast, or how to embed video
  • to get ideas for content
  • to learn how to write better, to express ideas better
  • to meet up with people with some related interests

I guess there are a lot of people who blog who would never come to a blogging conference because what and how they blog is enough for them and they don’t see any need to change anything. But there are also people who don’t do well in crowds, so one issue I see is how to encourage people who are less comfortable at conferences (even small ones), how to make them more comfortable. I don’t know what the answer is; I’m an introvert but it seldom stops me going places, so although I sympathize with those for whom it’s a problem, I’m not sure of what to do to help. If, indeed, anything can be done at the conference organizing level to help.

Feb 282008
 

One of the interesting sessions I went to at NorthernVoice was the Blogs are Dead; Long Live the Blogger session facilitated ably by Chris Lott. There’s a write-up on this wiki; as usual a lot of thought-provoking stuff was said, only some of which I’ve found recorded. I’ve noticed changes myself over the last few years of observing part of the blogging world (by necessity, only a small part).

I’ve noticed that lots of people aren’t blogging as much, or indeed any more, for varied reasons. Some spend more time on twitter, which scratches their communication itch, and effectively let their blog lapse. Some post no longer need to tell friends and family what they’re up to via a blog. A fair number of crafters are on Ravelry and post their projects there and don’t need a blog any more.

I’ve noticed changes in the blogs, too; maybe because many people whose blogs I read are using twitter et al for the more “trivial” discussions and thoughts, the blog postings tend to be about weightier subjects, or work-related. In many cases the tone is more formal and (dare I say it) boring; I’ve given up on quite a few blogs that used to be fun to read, even if the subject matter was inconsequential, because they now are more weighty and serious and not as entertaining. Or they’ve turned into collections of links. The occasional link posts, with comments as to why those links are worth clicking on, is fine, but I quickly tire of blogs that consist solely of links to other blogs and articles. I really can’t be bothered hanging on in the hope that the author will eventually come up with something original.

One big exception that I’ve noticed is the crafting blogs, which (notwithstanding the people who’ve quit now that they’re on Ravelry) have much the same type of content. I started a crafting blog after joining Ravelry, and I know others who’ve done the same. Many crafters see their blogs as a refreshing change from work, deliberately not talking about topics outside the boundaries, keeping the discussion focussed (more or less) on the serious crafting issues of types of yarn, whether the knitted object will fit once it’s finished, and the best way to create a particular design or concept. Or just posting “I did this this way and this is how it turned out.”

I don’t think the blog is dead; it’s just changing as the concept diffuses outside the circle of early adopters who are busy twittering at each other.

/* ]]> */