Dec 222006
 

OK, I give up. If Robin can get Michelle Dennedy to dis­close things in pub­lic, I guess I should ful­fil my oblig­a­tions as well. Be a good net­izen and all that. But I’m not going to tag any­one, par­tially to be con­trary, par­tially because people deserve time off from their blogs over the winter break, and par­tially because lots of inter­est­ing people I know who have not yet been tagged don’t actu­ally blog.

  • I grew up on a farm in New Zea­l­and. So I know quite a lot about farm­ing: dairy, pigs, a little about sheep. And the ubi­quit­ous ducks, chooks, cats, and dogs, of course. Pretty much every­one else who lived on a farm in the area was born there and lived there most of their lives; I was the outsider.
  • I was work­ing in Ber­lin at the time the Ber­lin Wall came down; it was an amaz­ing time and I will always treas­ure the memory of what real people power can do. If you have a few spare hours some time, buy me a beer, ask about pre/­post-Wall Ber­lin and I’ll dredge up as many details as you like.
  • I got into Web stuff via SGML and got into SGML via a Dutch friend who also stud­ied nuc­le­ar phys­ics; we col­lab­or­ated on a pub­lic­a­tion back in 1985. 
  • I do much of the small-scale renov­a­tion work in our house and at some stage will blog about stain­ing, var­nish­ing, etc. I’ve replaced studs as well, and mud­ded dry­wall, but those are tasks I out­source if pos­sible. I’ve dis­covered that plumb­ing needs even more patience than sys­tems administration.
  • When I’m tired my brain some­times switches into Ger­man and it takes quite a bit of effort to make it switch back so I can speak Eng­lish. Tim can testi­fy to this as I some­times start speak­ing Ger­man to him and don’t even real­ise I’m doing it.
Dec 192006
 

The light shone on that dark corner of the inter­net (see my Framed! post, as well as Tim’s Fram­ing Lauren linked post) and it brought res­ults. If you haven’t read my post­ing, go ahead; there’s too much inform­a­tion to use­fully sum­mar­ize here and the com­ments are good too. 

After read­ing all the com­ments that came in (includ­ing some private email), Tim and I chat­ted a bit with Paul Hoff­man, noted IETF/IMC heavy. A likely explan­a­tion (as poin­ted out by many com­menters) is that the pur­vey­ors of the “aff” sites were prob­ably try­ing to run an affil­i­ate scam on the Adult Friend Find­er site. They prob­ably chose my site to frame because Tim has a high Page Rank and often links to my site, and thus my Page Rank is also reas­on­ably high. Paul checked and found that they were doing their own name serving, hid­ing them­selves quite effect­ively from us (well, giv­en more time and effort I’m sure Paul could have dug up more inform­a­tion, but it did­n’t seem worth it). 

I pos­ted my piece on Sat­urday and Tim poin­ted to it not long after­wards. By Sunday after­noon the “aff” sites were notice­ably slower and seemed to be going off the air. The last refer­rer I had to my site was from site 23 on Monday Decem­ber 18th at 10 am loc­al time; pinging the address shows it’s still there but there is no longer an http serv­er attached to it. The site is still in the Google index but I expect that to go away at some stage as well. So they reacted quickly; I expect we will nev­er know the entire story. I’ve learned two things though: keep a closer eye on my access logs, and post about things that look weird. 

Dec 162006
 

This is a story of some of the dark corners of the inter­net, with a puzzle at the end and a request for advice…

Our story starts a few weeks ago. I had installed Stat­counter on the blog post­ings to keep an eye on who vis­its my blog and why, with more inform­a­tion than you get from per­us­ing access logs (I have those too). I also like fol­low­ing links back to refer­rers to see why they’re link­ing to my site, when I have time. A few weeks ago I noticed what looked like a spam site link­ing to my blog — you know the type of URL, it’s some non­sensic­al com­bin­a­tion of let­ters and digits. So I fol­lowed it back, only to find that it was a com­plete frame of my blog. View source showed only that my site was being framed. No oth­er con­tent was being added as ads, as meta con­tent, or any­thing else that I could see. Noth­ing that explained why they’re doing this.

So I looked up the whois for the site, dis­covered it’s hid­den by a com­pany called “Domains by Proxy”, which spe­cial­izes in hid­ing regis­tra­tion data for web sites. They have lots of inform­a­tion on their site about how they cooper­ate with law enforce­ment if people are doing some­thing illeg­al, which leads me to sus­pect that unless you can prove someone’s doing some­thing illeg­al they won’t do any­thing or even talk to you. Not that I tried talk­ing to them, since simply fram­ing my site isn’t illeg­al, or even con­tra­ven­ing my Cre­at­ive Com­mons license. It is, how­ever, highly suspicious.

A little more invest­ig­a­tion was in order; the num­ber of hits on my web­site from this site were increas­ing and oth­er ver­sions of the URL were show­ing up. The URL was of the form “aff” fol­lowed by “0000” fol­lowed by a num­ber, fol­lowed by .com (yes, it’s cir­cuit­ous, but I don’t want my site linked to theirs in search engines, for reas­ons that will become obvi­ous). I checked out and found that all num­bers from 1 to 28 poin­ted to my site. So someone paid to register 28 domains, host 28 domains, and put in HTML to point to my site? None of the URLs showed up in the com­mon search engines, but some­how they were being clicked on, seem­ingly by real people (spread of ISPs across the world, dif­fer­ent OSes, screen res­ol­u­tions, and browsers, all stay­ing for approx­im­ately zero seconds).

I con­tem­plated put­ting in some frame bust­ing code but decided to wait a little and see what happened, in case they were just get­ting ready to do some­thing. In the mean­time more of these sites start point­ing at mine. And finally one of them showed up in a search engine, and there it points to an adult site. One of those ones that may not be safe at work, at least judging by the front page. In which case the frame bust­ing isn’t the answer any­way, the people vis­it­ing this site don’t want to see my mus­ings on tech­no­logy, moth­er­hood, or knit­ting, they want the adult con­tent they expect.

Tim had the bright idea at this stage of using a com­mand-line fetch on the “aff” sites and found that the index page returns a list of poten­tial mis­spellings of the adult site’s name. About 10000 of them. The oth­er sites return sim­il­ar lists; num­ber 28 only returns about 7000 mis­spellings. If you search for one of these mis­spellings in a com­mon search engine, you land on an “aff” page, which then redir­ects you to the adult site. But only if you come from a search engine. If you type in that site name in the address bar, the redir­ect sends you to my blog.

So I have a couple of ques­tions, and would appre­ci­ate any thoughts or exper­i­ences you have.

  1. Why are they not redir­ect­ing to the adult site, which is prob­ably what the people who are click­ing on an “aff” site prob­ably want? Why send them to anoth­er site? 
  2. Related ques­tion: why me? Why someone who writes about tech­no­logy, and not someone on some free host­ing site who may not even notice the increase in traffic, let alone get sus­pi­cious about it?
  3. What do I do about it? I could block people from “aff” site from link­ing to my site; receiv­ing a “You’re in timeout.” mes­sage (error 403 as seen by Mark Pil­grim) might have some effect. One related ques­tion to this is why people are going to an “aff” site any­way; since the “aff” sites redir­ect people com­ing from search engines to the actu­al adult site itself one could sup­pose nobody would ever click on it. Tim sug­ges­ted people might be curi­ous; they see the URL in the search engine list­ings and type it in the address bar to see what’s there.

The adult site itself does have a tech­nic­al con­tact in the whois registry but the pur­vey­ors of the “aff” sites might not be them. Sug­ges­tions wel­come… the hits I’m get­ting have grown from noth­ing a few weeks ago to now being a sub­stan­tial part of the dir­ect hits on my site so it’s a prob­lem I want to solve soon.

Dec 092006
 

The next part of an occa­sion­al series on what we found to be use­ful with a baby. I’ve noticed a few people com­ing to this site with searches on baby stuff, so here’s some more!

Stand­ard lists for what you need for a baby always seem a little too pre­script­ive to me; “thou shalt have 6 sleep­ers and 4 bottles and .…” I’m not going to give num­bers for the simple reas­on that it all depends on your baby and how you do things. If you do laun­dry every day, you don’t need as many clothes, unless your baby spits up a lot, in which case you need as many as you can get. Etc.

So what do you need? 

Some­where for the baby to sleep. To start with, this can be a nice bassin­et, or a card­board box, the baby won’t really care. I’ve heard that car seats aren’t good for their heads if they sleep in them all the time, but if that’s where your baby is happy, I would­n’t worry about it too much. Even­tu­ally they need a crib or cot that’s big­ger and stronger and that they can­’t roll out of, but that can wait until they’re two or three months old. We always had the baby sleep in our room to start with as well, for the simple reas­on that it’s easi­er to get up and change them, feed them, and put them back down, if they’re close by. Also, I found that I woke up quite quickly and could feed the baby without it really wak­ing up prop­erly, so it ten­ded to go back to sleep read­ily after eat­ing. This may just be because both our babies were good sleep­ers, of course, but Penelope Leach’s book also seems to think there’s some­thing to this the­ory of get­ting them up when they just start cry­ing so they don’t get too upset. Once they’re older, things are dif­fer­ent as they can last longer without food, but it seems to work for the little babies.

Some clothes for the baby: com­fort­able ones to sleep in, and maybe some­thing that looks a little nicer to go out and be shown off in. People often give you clothes, in huge quant­it­ies, which come in really handy when your baby spits up a lot (see above) or you don’t have time to do laun­dry every day.

Receiv­ing blankets, which are basic­ally pieces of soft cloth such as flannelette that vary in size, any­where from about 24″ x 24″ (65cm x 65cm) to 36″ x 36″ (1m x 1m) or so; they can be square or rect­an­gu­lar. These are really use­ful, for swad­dling tiny babies (our first child loved this, our second did­n’t), as light blankets, as spit-up or burp clothes (the things labelled “burp clothes” in most stores are too small to be use­ful for any­thing oth­er than night-time nurs­ing pads), as change pads, as make­shift bibs, as sun screens, as mats in the bath, as wash­cloths, and as clothes if you’re really des­per­ate and everything else is dirty or wet. They have the added bonus of being use­ful after­wards, unlike a lot of baby appar­at­us — they’re great for wash­ing win­dows, dust­ing and pol­ish­ing fur­niture, apply­ing stain, or any­where else you need a soft, lint-free cloth. And believe me, they will be lint-free by the time the baby has out­grown need­ing them with being washed so often.

If you’re bottle-feed­ing, you’ll need that appar­at­us. Ours did­n’t take bottles, so I have no idea what is use­ful for bottle-feeding.

We nev­er used baby powder (could­n’t see the point) or pacifiers/dummies (first child spat it out across the room, nev­er needed to try with the second). 

Com­ing in a future post: thoughts on slings/baby car­ri­ers, baby mon­it­ors, pumps.

Dec 042006
 

I was chat­ting with Eve about crochet pat­terns that are worth mak­ing, and found out she did­n’t know about Priscil­la’s crochet. Priscil­la’s web­site was off the air for what seemed like ages (maybe a year?) but is now back again; it has lots of crochet pat­terns for afghans and book­marks and pothold­ers and that sort of thing. I’ve made a few of the pat­terns and not had any prob­lems with them. The site is a little clunky and old-fash­ioned, and has a couple of links that look weird, but don’t let that put you off the pat­terns themselves.

I’m fairly old-fash­ioned in what I like to crochet – mostly Christ­mas dec­or­a­tions, coast­ers, doil­ies, book­marks, hats. I tend to crochet things and then put them away and not use them as I don’t really have the right spots to show them off. Except for the coast­ers, which the cats seem to think I made for them to play with. I don’t usu­ally like the look of cro­cheted cloth­ing although some light, breezy sum­mer tops look good. Not that I’ve ever made one, my list of things to knit and crochet is long enough already! 

Oth­er pat­tern links I have found include Free Pat­terns; you have to register at the site but I haven’t got any spam from it that I know of. They have all sorts of pat­terns, not just for crochet and knit­ting. There’s Crochet­Me, which claims to have “con­tem­por­ary, cool, hip, fash­ion­able crochet.” There aren’t a lot of pat­terns there that interest me per­son­ally, but then there aren’t a lot of pat­terns (yet), so I’ll prob­ably look again in a few months time and see what’s there. In the pay-for cat­egory, some of the pat­terns at Stitch Diva look good, at least for warm­er days or a warm­er cli­mate. So many ideas, so little time…

Dec 012006
 

The book club I belong to decided to read Queen Noor’s “Leap of Faith: Mem­oirs of an Unex­pec­ted Life”, her auto­bi­o­graphy, and this is a sum­mary of our review. Part of the reas­on we chose this book was in the hopes that it would be a more access­ible way of learn­ing more about that part of the world, and par­tially because one of the mem­bers used to work in the same com­pany as Queen Noor when she was still Lisa Halaby, and was curi­ous as to what the book would be like.

The book was obvi­ously pop­u­lar amongst book clubs; there was a list of poten­tial ques­tions for people to dis­cuss in the back, most of which missed the point of the book in our opin­ion. So we ignored them.

Leap of Faith was writ­ten not only as an auto­bi­o­graphy, but also to expose Jord­an’s point of view to a wider (West­ern) audi­ence; Queen Noor is quite clear about that in the book. As such, it’s suc­cess­ful. It’s an easy read, though very choppy. The book has a mostly chro­no­lo­gic­al struc­ture, but keeps wan­der­ing off into themes and so you hear about vari­ous chil­dren and what they did before you get to read the chapter in which they’re born, for example. If you can read the book reas­on­ably quickly, then it all still hangs together. 

Our book club mem­ber who had known Lisa before (albeit not very well) poin­ted out that a lot of things were miss­ing; this is not a tell-all book and Queen Noor seems to be at some pains to paint her­self as naive and inno­cent before her mar­riage, des­pite her edu­ca­tion and work exper­i­ence. But the book does suc­ceed where it presents Jord­an’s point of view on issues, par­tic­u­larly the issue of Israel and Palestine. I am not par­tic­u­larly well read on Middle East­ern issues and pre­vi­ously had­n’t known that any­body there con­sidered the Egypt-Israel peace treaty of 1979 a bad idea; the book goes into some detail on why (chiefly that many wanted a com­pre­hens­ive peace treaty and feared that a piece­meal solu­tion would hinder that). I also had­n’t known that Jordan is a poor coun­try with no oil, or any­thing about the Hashemites, and this book is an access­ible intro­duc­tion to both of those topics.

In sum­mary, I found the book worth read­ing even though the chop­pi­ness and incon­sist­en­cies annoyed me. A good intro­duc­tion to a part of the world that I did­n’t know enough about pre­vi­ously, and prob­ably still don’t, but at least I know more than I did.

/* ]]> */