Apr 242007
 

When I was at uni­ver­sity in Auck­land, one guy said to me that he had­n’t real­ized he was sex­ist until he met me. I’ve always found dis­crim­in­a­tion based on the bio­lo­gic­al cap­ab­il­ity of bear­ing chil­dren to make about as much sense as dis­crim­in­a­tion based on eye col­our. It seems much of the world does­n’t agree, pre­fer­ring pre­judging abil­it­ies to the hard work of fig­ur­ing out real, rather than pre­sumed, cap­ab­il­it­ies. A lot of dis­crim­in­a­tion is simply not think­ing, accept­ing the movie or tele­vi­sion view of the world and the roles that women and men (or for that mat­ter, people not of west­ern european extrac­tion) have in it.

There’s quite a lot of sex­ism in tech­no­logy. One woman I know hates start­ing a new job, since, as she says, it takes six months to con­vince the guys I know how to turn on the light. Shelagh Cal­la­han told me of an exper­i­ence she had doing booth duty at a con­fer­ence. She was start­ing to explain some­thing to this guy when he inter­rup­ted her, said she did­n’t know enough and he knew Dr Cal­la­han, the lead­ing expert on this top­ic, and he (Dr Cal­la­han) had a dif­fer­ent opin­ion. At which someone stand­ing next to him sug­ges­ted he look at Shelagh’s name badge. I’ve had my fair share of con­des­cend­ing males assume I would­n’t under­stand what they’re talk­ing about or be able to con­trib­ute any­thing of value to a tech­nic­al dis­cus­sion. One could argue that most women would­n’t under­stand a tech­nic­al dis­cus­sion, but that’s no excuse for the assumption. 

Of course, this prob­lem isn’t lim­ited to tech­no­logy. A female law­yer friend of mine takes some pains to dress dif­fer­ently to the way sec­ret­ar­ies dress, for example, so it’s clear she’s a law­yer and not a sec­ret­ary. She says it’s been inter­est­ing watch­ing the devel­op­ment of some men, who at uni­ver­sity assumed every­one was a pro­fes­sion­al and treated them all equally, but once out in the leg­al work­force star­ted treat­ing men and women dif­fer­ently, assum­ing women were sec­ret­ar­ies and men were law­yers. With the large num­ber of women gradu­at­ing from law school these days that should change. Wheth­er the prac­tice of push­ing women law­yers off into fam­ily court (“you’re so good at being under­stand­ing”) where they earn less than crim­in­al court law­yers changes soon is an inter­est­ing question.

There are lots of aspects to sex­ism, quite a few where people don’t under­stand why I find them irrit­at­ing, or even upset­ting. As an example, send­ing mail addressed to Mr and Mrs {hus­band’s name}. Hav­ing people assume mar­ried people share a sur­name is not unreas­on­able, but assum­ing we also share a first name is. To me it smacks of Vic­tori­an-era treat­ment of women, where they were an append­age of the hus­band, not beings with sep­ar­ate iden­tit­ies. I guess it seems petty to worry about these sorts of things when women in so many coun­tries have it so much worse, but on the oth­er hand sex­ism cre­ates an envir­on­ment that is not wel­com­ing. If you don’t feel your pres­ence is val­ued in a soci­ety, then you’re not going to be a full part of that society.

  9 Responses to “Unthinking Sexism”

  1. My wife, who is a great gui­tar­ist, has been told by male mem­bers of the audi­ence her effect ped­al was not facing the right dir­ec­tion… She respon­ded with, “yes, I know”, a rather dirty look and rocked his face off. 

    It is incred­ibly frus­trat­ing to hear com­ments from people regard­ing how they think my wife is a good gui­tar­ist, for a girl. While I under­stand folks are not try­ing to be rude, it reflects the subtle and per­vas­ive nature of sexism. 

    Great post!

  2. I had the mis­for­tune of fin­ish­ing my PhD in 1992 at just the moment when affirm­at­ive action hir­ing in the uni­ver­sit­ies was at its height. That meant that we male can­did­ates had a bit more trouble get­ting inter­views (and land­ing jobs) than female can­did­ates, though it was­n’t nearly as bad as people made it out to be.

    Instead of whin­ing like a lot of my male col­leagues, I thought of the four pro­fess­ors (all female) who had been my biggest influ­ences through uni­ver­sity. They had had to fight much worse gender dis­crim­in­a­tion back in the 1960s and 70s on their way to ten­ure, and ended up decid­ing that if a woman had to be twice as good as a man to land the same job, they’d simply be twice as good.

    The biggest vic­tims of affirm­at­ive action, I think, were the women it was try­ing to pro­tect. Unlike the female pro­fess­ors of a gen­er­a­tion before, who fought their way, even a bril­liant and well-pub­lished new female pro­fess­or of our gen­er­a­tion had to work under a cloud of sus­pi­cion that she’d been hired only because of the con­fig­ur­a­tion of her repro­duct­ive organs.

  3. Sex­ism stinks on ice, and the fact that it’s still so vis­ible and unabashed is a mor­al out­rage. I think I was spared most of its taint, prob­ably due to my moth­er (1919–1981), a “first wave” feminist.

    Story: My par­ents once got a prop­erty-tax refund check made out to “THOMAS A COWAN AND WF”. My moth­er took it to the bank to depos­it, and asked the tell­er how to endorse it: “WF”? More like WTF. (She signed it “Mari­anne Cow­an”, as usu­al, and of course it went through.)

    Per­son­ally, at age 49 I’ve become increas­ingly unwill­ing to work in all-male (and fre­quently all-white-with-token-Asi­an) envir­on­ments. The repress­ive­ness and hos­til­ity that’s char­ac­ter­ist­ic of such groups is just too hard to bear: the snick­ers, the off­hand remarks, the crap. I used to think that segreg­a­tion was primar­ily a prob­lem because it lead to dis­crim­in­a­tion; now I see segreg­a­tion itself, how­ever sup­posedly vol­un­tary, as the evil.

    G.B. Shaw once said that giv­en a choice between female suf­frage (which did not exist in his day) and a require­ment for 50% female rep­res­ent­a­tion on all elect­ive bod­ies even if they were elec­ted only by men, he was unhes­it­at­ingly for the lat­ter. A hun­dred years later, we are not even close to such a fig­ure: even 10–20% would be a huge improvement.

  4. I com­pletely agree with you on the “Mr. and Mrs. John Jones” nam­ing thing. It is absurd in this day and age that this 19th-cen­tury form is still observed.

  5. Ancient lit­er­at­ure is filled with ref­er­ences to the male sec­ret­ary per­formed and recog­nized as both import­ant and luc­rat­ive for males through­out history.

    Male teach­ers were also once the stand­ard in education.

    The rel­at­ive recent trans­ition to being pre­dom­in­antly female clas­si­fic­a­tions in employ­ment became sex­ist and inher­ently dis­crim­in­at­ory when women entered the work force, and were releg­ated to what became low level employ­ment — without any basis or rationale.

    That the gender recon­cili­ation of this import­ant admin­is­trat­ive class has not been done to encour­age and reflect a uni­sex status is pure neg­li­gence, and a pref­er­ence for gender spe­cial­iz­a­tion that works as dis­ad­vant­age to both men and women. The term is so affil­i­ated with gender that it should be dropped alto­geth­er by mod­ern soci­ety as a default sexism.

  6. Don’t start with the “It seems petty to protest” stuff; that’s what women have always said, and why they’re still second class cit­izens! The only way to get any­where is to give’m hell, Lauren. Go for it, be bold, nev­er back down. Then you may at last be accep­ted as a genu­ine PERSON with a MIND, not just some poor schmuck­’s wife. Remem­ber, dis­crim­in­a­tion hurts every­one, not just women.

  7. I’m only 12 and I hate sex­ism. I can­’t believe that the men thought they con­trolled everything and the women had to stay home­and look after the children.

  8. Ha- it’s a joke. The amount of sex­ism still in the world. And I DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY WE JUST SIT BACK AND LET IT HAPPEN. Like wtf men still get paid more than women??? LIKE WTF??
    And the thing I can­’t under­stand is why they think they’re bet­ter than us.
    Haha they’re so pathetic.
    They’re so insec­cure and threatened by us that they have to pre­tend they’re super­i­or and in con­trol of us.
    Like wtf they can­’t con­trol them­selves when we show like a TINY bit of our leg. Ser­i­ously, what a TRAGIC flaw.
    We can get them to do any­thing for us just by act­ing inno­cent and look­ing pretty- use it against them.
    We have been con­trolled for so many years, why aren’t we angry? Why aren’t we fight­ing back? WHY ARE WE STILL LETTING THEM SAY THEIR CRAP?
    Why are they still seen as the ‘head of the house’- lmfao what a pathet­ic way to show how insec­cure they are.
    We are going to come back stronger and actu­ally BE EQUAL! But I guess that’s kind of impossible in this world so there­fore it will be men against women until they’re slightly intel­li­gent enough to real­ise that we are actu­ally equal.
    Any­way, I can come back anoth­er day when I have exper­i­enced even more sex­ism and trust me, I will not stop fight­ing this til we have won.

    Love from Laura, age 14, London!

  9. ..it takes six months to con­vince the guys I know how to turn on the light. ” That is so true in the IT industry. I don’t have a prob­lem with sex­ist jokes as long as behind the baf­foon­ery, the guys trust in my skill­sets. That becomes appar­ent with the review, and inev­it­ably women will find there are men who are extremely sex­ist, some mod­er­ately, and oth­ers not. The best is to find a group that is not, but the lay­er­ing of subtle sex­ism is still quite rampant in the IT industry, as I’ve encountered in the past 15 years as a sys­tems ana­lyst at a For­tune 500 com­pany. As a woman, you can expect less pay, less advance­ment over time, and less flex­ib­il­ity when it comes to mov­ing groups. When you are young­er, I’d say women have more power to nego­ti­ate these aspects, even with less developed skill­sets. It’s very very unfair, not as in the factor work­er scen­ario. It’s unfair in this regard: you can expect to earn enough to live and own a com­fort­able apart­ment, but not in a nice little man­sion like a man who star­ted in the same role and moved up the lad­ders over the years, or someone who has the same know­ledge gains over the past dec­ade. The end res­ult is aston­ish­ing. And if you get preg­nant, say good­bye to any bonuses for work you may have com­pleted that year, or any good reviews. I have exper­i­enced this sex­ism, com­plained to HR, provided detail on how my cur­rent man­ager and his man­ager were sys­tem­at­ic­ally re-orging all the women out of tech­nic­al roles, and pla­cing them in lim­it­ing non-tech­nic­al roles, and HR did noth­ing to improve the situ­ation. The repro­cu­sions of sex­ism is that hard work gets ignored more often, requests for raises and pro­mo­tions denied more, and your abil­ity as a woman to remain optim­ist­ic is greatly reduced. Even in 2009, so many years after the women’s revolu­tion, guys still look for a “buddy” to work with, not a pro­fes­sion­al collegue.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)

/* ]]> */