We just finished the XML 2005 Planning Committee Selection Meeting, three days at the end of last week. This is one of the fun, albeit exhausting, parts of the conference, when all the would-be speakers have submitted their abstracts, the reviewers have graded them and commented on them, and then the Planning Committee gets to build a compelling schedule out of them.
The papers this year didn’t fit into areas or tracks as neatly as in previous years; I think this means that XML usages are broadening away from the “classic” publishing/web services/core technologies and moving into more mixed areas. It hasn’t been about the syntax for some years now, of course. There are papers that are showing more research into uses of XML, more rigour in designing systems, and more emphasis on getting things to work right.
Of course there were lots of papers where the authors proved they didn’t bother reading any of the hints on writing abstracts on the conference web site. When abstracts are meant to be 500 words long, those that are under 50 get short shrift by the reviewers. Those with misspelled acronyms or loaded up with buzzwords or that looked like advertisements for products didn’t do too well either. Fortunately the reviewers did a good job at ranking the papers, and giving us lots of comments to back up their grades, so I think we have a strong program this year, full of interesting content. We’ll be publishing the schedule once the accepted speakers have had a chance to confirm their talks.
For those who don’t have speaking slots, or who get the dreaded rejection email in the next week or so, don’t despair! We decided to keep the conference content really fresh this year by reserving 20% of the speaking slots for late-breaking, instead of the usual 10%. So read over those writing hints, mark your calendars for September 16, and, come late July, see what holes we have in the schedule that your content is perfect for filling!
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.