Jul 162008
 

The idea of wikis, the whole concept of col­lab­or­at­ive author­ing, is so enti­cing that it seems like it should be the default (at least if you don’t need more struc­tured markup behind it), even in the enter­prise. At least, that’s what I thought some years ago. People still like to send around office doc­u­ments with revi­sion mark­ing turned on, how­ever, rather than fully embrace the Brave New World. 

I tweeted that one prob­lem is likely the off­line issues (can­’t read the doc­u­ment on the air­plane unless I’ve saved a copy first); Edd added the “lost doc­u­ment” prob­lem where you can eas­ily lose a doc­u­ment when someone deletes the link to it, and you nev­er find it again. Spam, as Norm poin­ted out, is anoth­er issue on the inter­net, though it should­n’t be on the intranet.

And then there’s the issue of wiki markup, which some people detest. One pro­ject I’m work­ing on for Sun is using Medi­aWiki, for which you can export a doc­u­ment from Open­Of­fice, so that helps with at least get­ting the first draft of the doc­u­ment into the sys­tem. There’s still the update prob­lem; I gath­er that is slated for a future release of the wiki pub­lish­er exten­sion. When that works, I hope it will make it easi­er to talk cer­tain mem­bers of my team at Sun into using the sys­tem will­ingly <grin>.

  3 Responses to “Using Wikis”

  1. Hey Lauren, you might like to take a look at Tiddly­Wiki, a small Open Source wiki I con­trib­ute to. 

    The entire Wiki is in a single HTML file, each “wiki page” being an edit­able para­graph, stored in the HTML as a div and presen­ted using Javas­cript bundled in the same file. 

    You can save changes back to a loc­al file URI, attach Tiddly­Wi­kis to emails, pass them around on USB sticks, much as for office doc­u­ments. There are also sev­er­al serv­er side ver­sions, with dif­fer­ent slants on stor­age, deal­ing with con­flicts and authen­tic­a­tion — one of the easi­est places to try a single file, user ver­sion being http://tiddlyspot.com

    It’s pretty extens­ible, with a neat plu­gin and adaptor archi­tec­ture. Folks have writ­ten adaptors to import/export to and from oth­er Wikis includ­ing Medi­aWiki, and the dev / user mail­ing lists are pretty active:

    http://tiddlywiki.com

  2. Looks very inter­est­ing — thanks for point­ing it out!

  3. Hi Lauren,

    I star­ted port­ing our doc­u­ment­a­tion to wiki about 3 years ago. It’s been such a suc­cess that we now mir­ror the con­tent to an extern­al copy. I use dok­uwiki (which also has Open­Of­fice con­ver­sion) mainly because of the low threshold for unskilled users and because it uses flat files instead of a data­base. It has rad­ic­ally changed my role as tech­nic­al writer from being a writer per se to being an edit­or, super­visor, ment­or and facilitator.

Leave a Reply to Paul Downey Cancel reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)

/* ]]> */